Re: Posters! [large images]
Conclusion:
TO MAKE A THIRTY MINUTE FILM at five frames each second at fifteen frames per second WOULD TAKE A TOTAL OF 93.75 (NINETY THREE POINT SEVEN FIVE) DAYSI'd like to see that done.
Oh, BLUNTY!
You are not logged in. Please login or register
New Screencast! - Featured this time: the admin page!
Having problems connecting to the chat? Read this thread! And Night Owl has posted some general forum guidelines.
Back to: Refugee Camp - Back to: Brickfilming - You are here: Posters! [large images]
Conclusion:
TO MAKE A THIRTY MINUTE FILM at five frames each second at fifteen frames per second WOULD TAKE A TOTAL OF 93.75 (NINETY THREE POINT SEVEN FIVE) DAYSI'd like to see that done.
Oh, BLUNTY!
I have it.
Leo, a 30 minute film would be a freaking 27000 frames long at 15fps. Which, if each fram took 5 seconds (my fastest speed), it'd take:
27,000 x 5 = 135,000
135,000 / 60 = 2250
2250 / 24 = 93.75Conclusion:
TO MAKE A THIRTY MINUTE FILM at five frames each second at fifteen frames per second WOULD TAKE A TOTAL OF 93.75 (NINETY THREE POINT SEVEN FIVE) DAYSI'd like to see that done.
I have five bucks that says I could do it in CG in 10 minutes.
-Leonardo
I have it.
Leo, a 30 minute film would be a freaking 27000 frames long at 15fps. Which, if each fram took 5 seconds (my fastest speed), it'd take:
27,000 x 5 = 135,000
135,000 / 60 = 2250
2250 / 24 = 93.75Conclusion:
TO MAKE A THIRTY MINUTE FILM at five frames each second at fifteen frames per second WOULD TAKE A TOTAL OF 93.75 (NINETY THREE POINT SEVEN FIVE) DAYSI'd like to see that done.
That, of course, is assuming that the animator literally takes 27000 pictures. There are many other things that reduce this amount of pictures drastically: you can loop a lot of still frames (lots of people do that), there are the titles and stuff... lots of nifty little tricks to reduce it.
EDIT: Might I add that your calculations are wrong.
If you take 5 seconds on 1 frame, you do one minute on 12 frames. That means that 15 frames (one second of animation) would take 15/12 = 1.25 minutes.
15 frames is 1.25 minutes, so 27 000 frames takes (27000/15) * 1.25 = 2250 minutes. This is 2250/60=37.5 hours or 1 and a half days of non stop animating.
Last edited by BertL (2008-05-07 14:55:36)

Lol! Pwnt.
That means you could churn out a film about the length of Return of the King in under a month.
That means you could churn out a film about the length of Return of the King in under a month.
Well that math, while correct, does not take into account everything else, scripting, casting, set building, editing, and also, 5 seconds a frame is only correct when you are moving 1 or possibly 2 subjects or the simple nature (such as cars, things that just need a slight touch) i would say about 5 seconds for 1 frame with 1 fig walking, and up from there.
Also as we all know, harder moves take longer to plan and animate. So yes, in theroy he could make a 4 hour movie in a month, but i might just be one figure walking around since our mathematics arent factoring in the rest of the process.
i woud go so far as to say that its not even worth the time to compute, because those other processes are different for all of us, and vary bettween scene or movie.
I'll use myself as an example, there are alot of graphcs in my newest film (mass media in a changing world), specificially alot of "news" style graphics. In dicussion with a production major class mate of mine recently he commented on how he wasnt even sure of how i built alot of those graphics and that he would have taken him ages to do simplier version of them, where as it took me around an hour for each of the news sets to be finsihed (an hour from when i captured the frame to when i finsiehd the graphics, on aveage, some took longer, some took less).
So to end this rant, it all comes down to skill level and experience, i hadnt animated in almost 3 years when i started making mass media, but i had been working around 30 hours a week in photoshop, premier and AE for those 3 years. So it took me longer to get back into the animating swing, but less time to complete my graphics (since i'd been doing stuff like that daily at my former job).
Well, i think i got a little off topic there, but thats ok, thats what brickfilming is all about ![]()
And you cant animate for a full 24 hours.

Last edited by Roger (2008-05-10 15:23:40)
Thats awesome; can`t wait for the film.
I'm with jimmybob. That's actually the film I'm most looking forward to at the moment.
Ok. That was a lie. I'm looking forward to "Worthless" finally being released.
-Leonardo
I actually have no idea. Frankenstein was pretty scary. You have to admit, it's hard to get little plastic men with painted-on faces to be scary, but it's been done.
-Leonardo
Please, Pinkins looks way scarier ![]()
Page [ 5 of 5 ] Posts [ 101 to 110 of 110 ]
Back to: Refugee Camp - Back to: Brickfilming - You are here: Posters! [large images]